DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF D-DIMER FOR PULMONARY EMBOLISM: DETERMINATION OF AN OPTIMAL HIGH CUT-OFF VALUE

Home \ Archives\vol 2, No 1, 2026\ Articles

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF D-DIMER FOR PULMONARY EMBOLISM: DETERMINATION OF AN OPTIMAL HIGH CUT-OFF VALUE

DOI:10.64587/NOONSJ.v26i.813

Volume (2), Issue (1) , June 2026

Published: 06/30/2026

Abstract: It might be difficult to diagnose acute pulmonary embolism (APE) in a timely manner since it is a potentially lethal illness. The preferred modality is now computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), which adds to the growing strain on CT scanners in emergency rooms.Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic role of D-dimer and determine an optimal cut-off value for predicting PE and retain a high sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) while lowering the need for CTPA.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 patients. Demographic data, D-dimer levels, and PE status were analyzed. ROC curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value, and sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated. The results showed that the mean age was 57.8 ± 18.86 years, with 71.4% females. PE was present in 31.4% of patients. The optimal D-dimer cut-off value was 3500 ng/ml, yielding a sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 95.8%, PPV of 90.9%, and NPV of 95.8%. Higher D-dimer levels were associated with proximal PE. It is concluded that D-dimer demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy for PE. A higher cut-off value improved specificity while maintaining high sensitivity, supporting its clinical utility in both ruling in and ruling out PE.

Keywords: Computed tomography; pulmonary embolism; sensitivity

References

Abcarian, P.W., Sweet, J. D., Watabe, J.T., & Yoon, H.-C. (2004). Role of a quantitative D-dimer assay in determining the need for CT angiography of acute pulmonary embolism. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 182(6), 1377–1381.

Arularasu, P., Sekar, G., & Nagesh, N.J. (2024). Precision in pulmonary embolism diagnosis: Leveraging D-dimer levels with computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) insights. Cureus, 16(8), Article e67765. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.67765.

Douma, R.A., le Gal, G., Söhne, M., Righini, M., Kamphuisen, P.W., Perrier, A., Kruip, M.J., Bounameaux, H., Büller, H. R., & Roy, P. M. (2010). Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 340, c1475. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1475

Gao, H., Liu, H., & Li, Y. (2018). Value of D-dimer levels for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: An analysis of 32 cases with computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 16(2), 1554–1560.

Gimber, L.H., Leong, J., Todoki, L., & Yoon, H.-C. (2013). Avoiding unnecessary pulmonary CT angiography by using a combination of clinical criteria and D-dimer thresholds. Open Journal of Radiology, 3(2), 78–84.

Ji, Y., Sun, B., Juggessur-Mungur, K.S., Li, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Correlation of D-dimer level with the radiological severity indexes of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Chinese Medical Journal, 127(11), 2022–2027.

Kearon, C., de Wit, K., Parpia, S., Schulman, S., Afilalo, M., Hirsch, A., Spencer, F.A., Sharma, S.D’Aragon, F., Deshaies, J.-F., Le Gal, G., Lazo-Langner, A., Wu, C., Rudd-Scott, L., Bates, S. M., & Julian, J. A. (2019). Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism with d-Dimer Adjusted to Clinical Probability. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(22), 2125–2134. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1909159 Konstantinides, S. V., Meyer, G., Becattini, C., Bueno, H., Geersing, G. J., Harjola, V. P., Huisman, M. V., Humbert, M., Jennings, C.S., Jiménez, D., Kucher, N., Lang, I.M., Lankeit, M., Lorusso, R., Mazzolai, L., Meneveau, N., Áinle, F. N., Prandoni, P., Pruszczyk, P., Righini, M., … (2019). The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) (2019). Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). The European Respiratory Journal, 54(3), 1901647. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01647-2019

Kovács, A., Hantosi, D., Szabó, N., Letoha, A., Lengyel, C., Földesi, I., Varga, R.B., Szabó, S., & Sepp, R. (2024). D-dimer levels to exclude pulmonary embolism and reduce the need for CT angiography in COVID-19 in an outpatient population. PLOS ONE, 19(1), Article e0297023.

Kruger, R. A., Du Plessis, J., & Muller, H. (2024). Pulmonary embolism diagnosis with D-dimer levels and computed tomography. Health SA Gesondheid, 29, Article a2620.

Kubak, M.P., Lauritzen, P.M., Borthne, A., Ruud, E.A., & Ashraf, H. (2016). Elevated d-dimer cut-off values for computed tomography pulmonary angiography–d-dimer correlates with location of embolism. Annals of Translational Medicine, 4(11), Article 212. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.05.55.

Righini, M., Es, J.V., Exter, P.L.D., Roy, P.-M., Verschuren, F., Ghuysen, A., Rutschmann, O.T., Sanchez,

O., Jaffrelot, M., Trinh-Duc, A., Gall, C.L., Moustafa, F., Principe, A., Houten, A.A.V., Wolde, M.T., Douma, R.A., Hazelaar, G., Erkens, P.M.G., Kralingen, K.W.V., & Grootenboers, M.J. J.H. (2014). Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Levels to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism: The ADJUST-PE Study, 311(11), 1117–1124. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.2135

Schouten, H.J., Geersing, G.J., Koek, H.L., Zuithoff, N.P.A., Janssen, K.J.M., Douma, R.A., van Delden, J.J.M., Moons, K.G.M., & Reitsma, J.B. (2013). Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 346(may03 1), f2492–f2492. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2492

Sikora-Skrabaka, M., Skrabaka, D., Ruggeri, P., Caramori, G., Skoczyński, S., & Barczyk, A. (2019). D-dimer value in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism—may it exclude only? Journal of Thoracic Disease, 11(3), 664–672.

Stein, P.D., Fowler, S.E., Goodman, L.R., Gottschalk, A., Hales, C.A., Hull, R.D., Leeper, K.V., Jr,

Popovich, J., Jr, Quinn, D.A., Sos, T.A., Sostman, H.D., Tapson, V.F., Wakefield, T.W., Weg, J.G., Woodard, P. K., & PIOPED II Investigators (2006). Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. The New England journal of medicine, 354(22), 2317–2327. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052367

Stuppner, S., & Ruiu, A. (2019). Correlation of acute pulmonal embolism with D-dimer levels and the diameter of the pulmonary trunk in thoracic multislice computed tomography: A single-centre retrospective analysis of 100 patients. Polish Journal of Radiology, 84, e347–e352. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2019.88330.

Talabani, S.S.H., & AlZuhairy, A.K.A. (2025). Role of CT pulmonary angiography in clinically suspected cases of acute pulmonary embolism: Correlation with Wells score. Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences, 14(5), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.47310/jpms2025140508.

van der Hulle, T., Cheung, W.Y., Kooij, S., Beenen, L.F.M., van Bemmel, T., van Es, J., Faber, L. M., Hazelaar, G.M., Heringhaus, C., Hofstee, H., Hovens, M.M.C., Kaasjager, K.A.H., van Klink, R.C. J., Kruip, M.J.H.A., Loeffen, R.F., Mairuhu, A.T.A., Middeldorp, S., Nijkeuter, M., van der Pol, L.M., Schol-Gelok, S., … YEARS study group (2017). Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet (London, England), 390(10091), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30885-1.

Vural, N., Çete, Y., & Duyan, M. (2022). Correlation of pulmonary embolism with D-dimer level and determination of cut-off values according to age. Anatolian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 5(4), 153–

https://doi.org/10.54996/anatolianjem.1063767.